The arguments over 28 days detention rumble on. The opposition parties are hopelessly on the backfoot on this one. The position should not just be against an increase in 28 days, they should be calling for the limit to come back down. This would be in line with other Western democracies.
In the world of concessions, if you don't adopt a decent bargaining position, then you end up paying a lot more. By arguing that we stay on 28 days, it is inevitable there will be some increase on that. Already the opposition offered up post-charge questioning and the use of intercept evidence as an alternative to increasing the detention limit. The government gobbled these up and still want an increase in pre-charge detention. Whatever the case, sadly Gordon Brown gets what he wants, which is to look tough on the issue, not matter how absurd his proposition is.
On stop and search, these look like continuing indefinitely in Scotland by the British Transport Police. The rationale seems to be that because of the new form of terror, having surveillance of train stations to be on the lookout for suspect packages is not good enough anymore. Now people strap them to themselves or smash in with their cars. By randomly stopping and searching people, the argument goes that our transport network becomes a hostile place for would-be terrorists.
The problem with this analysis is that a would-be bomber would simply have to press a button if stopped by the police while on his way to detonate a bomb. His job would be done. Meanwhile, stop and search is humiliating the disproportionate number of Asian-looking people that are stopped under it, undermining good relations between police and communities which are essential at this moment in time.
Opposition to ID cards continues to grow too, with Baroness Shirley Williams the latest to say she will go to jail rather than carry one.