« You can be religious and British | Main | Mirror images of the BNP »

29 January 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c34b553ef00d834de64a553ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cameron: Muslims must be taught English, believers in shariah are like the BNP:

Comments

Sunny

Sure, citing Sharia is a straw-man argument, but there are two inescapable facts here:

1) Most Britons don't see Shariah as you do, and neither do they see its benign side (on interest rates or mortgages) as you do.

2) I don't think there has been a proper debate within the Muslim community/intelligensia (I'm giving a London example here) on Shariah law and its relevance (or lack of) in the UK. When people such as Zia Sardar write about it, people start criticising as if he's just been blasphemous. I believe Yusuf Smith had something along those lines. Unless you confront the 'Chavlims' who think, without really thinking about it, that 'Da cliphate would be a good idea innit' then you're going to see this cropping up.

When I use 'Chavlims', I refer to the council-house kind who cropped up in Jon Snow's earlier doc What Muslims Want, spouting off about how a Caliphate would be great without knowing the full intricacies.

Admittedly, such conversations are not easy. Its difficult to have a rational conversation about the stupidity of the Khalistan project, but you're a "community leader" Osama, step up! ;)

Osama

Sunny, I do agree. There has been a lot of misrepresentation of the shariah issue by both sides. The balanced view has not been put forward, but its mainly because most Muslim orgs would take the view that it is not an issue. There has just been no need to educate about shariah, caliphate etc because it's such a distant thing, far removed from current priorities. The idiocy of the Cameron position is now it's going to force people to come out and talk about it. I'll hopefully be posting more on this later.

However, when proper views on shariah have been put forward such as in my Guardian article linked to in the post, the comments editor of the newspaper gets hounded for having the temerity to open up such a debate. If there's no space for discussion then I'm sure you can see it's hard to get the proper views across.

Yakoub Islam

Even "intelligent" Muslims still pop down the kutub and pick up a copy of Doi's "Shariah: The Islamic Law" and think this Muslim version of the Napolean's civic law code is the real macoy! But then not so many kutub's are going to stock works by people like Khaled Abou El Fadl because, despite being a Madrassa trained scholar of some repute, he has committed the crime of becoming a professor of law at UCLA and is thus 'Western' (despite being one of the world's foremost authorities on Shariah). And that's before we start on the sectarian nature of kutubs. It aint just the chavlims who are the problem. Some of the supposedly 'educated' Muslims (i.e. middle class) are just as dogmatic and empty headed and small-minded as the chavlims. They are simply more articulate when it comes to spreading their nonsense!

Wasalaam

Yakoub

bat020

"Unless you confront the 'Chavlims' who think, without really thinking about it, that 'Da cliphate would be a good idea innit' then you're going to see this cropping up. When I use 'Chavlims', I refer to the council-house kind..."

This is just disgusting - pure, unadulterated class prejudice and snobbery. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Osama

Sorry Sunny I should have added that even if there isn't enough knowledge out there, it ill-behoves someone aspiring to be PM to comment on a matter from a position of such ignorance.

James O

This is just disgusting - pure, unadulterated class prejudice and snobbery. You should be ashamed of yourself.

I couldn't agree more, Bat

interested by-stander

I am a white christian with no particular understanding or knowledge of Islam.

It seems to me obvious that there is not the remotest possibility of sharia law or some kind on caliphate being set up in Scotland, where muslims are a small minority.

What disturbs me with Cameron and New Labour is there constant harping on about some amorphous but terrifying threat they recommend the rest of us see in Muslims.

Cameron's recent intervention and just about everything said by Reid and Blair heighten resentments and create a sense of division.They are intellectually bankrupt and invite a sense of alienation on the part of those they misrepresent.

The Muslim community, if that is a homogeneuous entity, should be left alone. What compromises my security is not a small minority of my fellow citizens who are overwhelmingly law abiding but stupid, pointless foreign adventures which end up providing a stomping ground and recruitment centre for terrorism.

Sunny

Sorry Sunny I should have added that even if there isn't enough knowledge out there, it ill-behoves someone aspiring to be PM to comment on a matter from a position of such ignorance.

C'mon Osama - ignorance breeds fear, we all know that. We have the MCB's Abdurjafar telling everyone on comment is Free that the sole reason for the existence of Sikhs is so they can kill all Muslims. Nice.... and he's near the top of the MCB food chain, what sort of stuff are other people thinking?

Yes the MPs are ignorant - but its our job to educate them about an area they've been thrust into and are frantically flailing about to get some bearings. Instead you're getting upset about the use of a word that has no relevance to the last 500 years. If skinheads were screaming - "we're coming in a crusade to get you" or something I'd understand.

So on the one hand you say you want to engage, on the other you start stressing about irrelevent points - is it any wonder dialogue is so bloody difficult?

Bat - shut up will you.

Osama

Sunny, I think I've added a bit more to the debate than the c-word. And if you think it's ok for leaders of parties to make ignorant comments - no matter what the reason - then good for you.

James O

'Bat - shut up will you.'

as usual, Sunny has resorted to insults and name-calling when challenged. Try and surprise us once by answering Bat's point would you Sunny?

Sunny

Sunny, I think I've added a bit more to the debate than the c-word

Where? You're only known in the context of the report as having been offended by the c-word.

Osama

Do feel free to ignore Bat and James' point!

You really are quite naive when it comes to how the media portray a story. I've got more comments on my blog, let me dig out the address for you...

Sohaib

What strikes me most, if you look at the top of the post, is the similarity of pose between Cameron's picture and Osama's on the right-hand bar!

joe90

A scary thought - one them could be the next Prime Minister!

A new blog on the block I've just discovered from a friend - run by a groovy dude from Pakistan and a resident here in bonnie auld Scotia, would you believe!

http://fanonite.wordpress.com/about/>The Fanonite

I've no idea what his real politics are though - whether he's a Hun-nite or a Tim-mite?

ps
what is David Cameron doing on the Star Trek transporter, and where is he being beamed up from?
Maybe, Tories are aliens after all!

Osama

That is the bold Idrees, he's a good man, and it's good to see he's got a blog. Cheers for the tipoff Joe.

aineliva

Osama, is Sohaib trying to infer that you are a "conservative" at heart, or a Conservative? :-)

Osama

Sohaib - slap! ;)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Feeds


  • Subscribe in Bloglines

    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Add to Google


  • Enter your email address:

    Get alerts of new posts