Translation:
To the Lebanese citzens residing south of the Litani River
Read this document with full comprehension and do as it orders.
The IDF will escalate its activities and will hit with the most excessive force terrorist elements that uses you as human shields and fires rockets/missiles from inside your houses in the direction of the state of Israel.
Every car including any type that moves south of the Litani river will be bombed because it is suspected in transporting rockets/missiles and military and ruining equipment.
It is your duty to do so as every person in any car is placing their life in danger.
State of Israel
Via Angry Arab, hat tip








If only Hitler and his henchmen had known that all they had to do was drop leaflets telling gays, gypsies, Poles, commies, Social Democrats, and other assorted future victims to leave, everything they did to those remaining afterwards would be acceptable! I guess speeches don't count as warnings, as I'd bet there were several such orations given. Who knew?
"It is your duty to do so". WTF? Lebanese murder victims have a duty to perform for the IDF? Bomb test dummies?
We now return you to planet Earth, circa 2006, and your previously scheduled reality.
Nice site, by the way.
Posted by: Serf in USA | 09 August 2006 at 07:59 PM
The great Norman Finkelstein's website is carrying an article reproduced from last Sunday's edition of our very own pro-brit blatt, 'The Sunday Herald'
"Lebanon government joins forces with bid to have Blair tried in Scotland for war crimes"
Norman helpfully ads his own headline -
http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=378>Let's hope Scotland hasn't abolished capital punishment
If wishes were fishes...!
Posted by: joe90 | 09 August 2006 at 08:27 PM
They are even calling homes and letting them know this message!
Posted by: Mohammad | 10 August 2006 at 02:26 PM
What would you prefer? No warning? His-bollocks sure don't give anyone the courtesy of a warning. They are real men who hide bombs and take out civilians in terror strikes.
Posted by: kris | 10 August 2006 at 02:50 PM
Kris, if someone put a leaflet through your door telling you to leave your house, would you? And if you did, wouldn't you say that you'd been a victim of terror?
Let's not also forget that those leaving have been bombed by the Israelis anyway.
Posted by: Osama | 10 August 2006 at 08:15 PM
The Lebanese are afraid that if they stay, they will be bombed and if they leave, they will be bombed en route.
So much for the warning.
Many will prefer to stay in their homes until they are bombed, no doubt. It's a matter of principle.
Posted by: Yasmin Mahdi | 10 August 2006 at 09:20 PM
Yes,
another perfect example of those who practice 'purity of arms' -
Which other army in the world would warn civilians to get out of their houses, force vast swathes of a country's population to become refugees and then bomb them as they try to get out -
- bombs all the petrol stations so no-one has any petrol for their cars, even if they did want to head north -
- bombs the Red Cross as it tries to get in and help ?
- bombs humanitarian aid convoys ?
- turns back planeloads of humanitarian aid ?
- bombs a whole country because of some minor border incident - beginning to sound sound familiar now ?
- bombs and invades and carries out ethnic cleansing because of some minor border incident - sounds really familair now?
Yes,
which other army is capable of such heroic feats against overpowering hostile neighbouring threats such as a small militia bummed-up as some kind of huge international demonic threat to western civilisation as we know it?
Don't ask a western journalist, because they haven't got a clue, apparantley!
Posted by: joe90 | 10 August 2006 at 09:53 PM
you know what- I am amazed there are people justifying Hizbollocks. Here's an international relations grundnorm: Don't start shit you don't want to finish- simple as that.
Hizbollocks knew exactly what they were playing at when they captured the israeli soldiers- and they didn't give a toss about the families on both/either side who woud bear the brunt of the response.
I am looking forward to your next post Osama re the latest round-up of lemmings who want to take themselves and innocent families, muslim, jewish, hindu, etc on their vacations out. Or maybe it was just a Forest Gate fit-up? Please take this posting as your written invitation to pull your collective heads out.
Posted by: kris | 11 August 2006 at 11:12 AM
You'd have be slow of thinking to believe the Israeli operation was only triggered by Hizbollah capturing/kidnapping Israeli soldiers.
Posted by: thabet | 11 August 2006 at 12:36 PM
It's axiomatic these days
ie incapable of conradiction
When Israel does it, it's the Arabs fault!
When Arabs do it, it's the Arabs fault!
Posted by: joe90 | 11 August 2006 at 01:44 PM
enlighten me, if it wasn't the capture of the israeli soldiers- what was it?
Posted by: kris | 11 August 2006 at 10:36 PM
What was what ?
Who are you talking to kris - and what are you talking about when you refer to it?
Posted by: joe90 | 11 August 2006 at 11:17 PM
the trigger- for the latest war- that's what. Sorry, I thought self-explanatory.
You guys are awful quite re the latest terror plot bust.
Posted by: kris | 12 August 2006 at 08:38 PM
Unlike the pavlovian corporate western mass-media I assume -
- the same folk who brought us 'Iraqi WMD' and that Saddam was worse than Hitler -
- although I don't recall anybody complaining at the time that the two regimes couldn't be compared to each other in terms of 'moral equivalence' -
Strange how quiet the western mass-media are about the ongoing mass-murders going on in human slaughter-houses of Afghanistan and Iraq at the moment
Posted by: joe90 | 12 August 2006 at 08:56 PM
A minor border incident leads to a full scale military assualt on weak and defenceless neighbouring states which, it is claimed, are deeply involved and implicated with carrying out terrorist activities and atrocities which, heretofore, have been tolerated because we are a peace-loving nation, but not anymore -
- sounds familiar - now where have I heard these piss-poor excuses and before?
Posted by: joe90 | 12 August 2006 at 09:50 PM
enlighten me, if it wasn't the capture of the israeli soldiers- what was it?
Wheter or not one likes Hizbollah's ideology, the capture of Israeli soldiers was not unexpected; this is clearly misinformation the likes of Blair are spreading. Nasrallah had been threatening to do so since the beginning of 2006 as a means of forcing israel to hand back lebanese prisoners.
Posted by: thabet | 13 August 2006 at 06:03 AM